$ 25 Million GMO and Pesticide Safety Study Launched in London

$ 25 Million GMO and Pesticide Safety Study Launched in London

World’s Largest Ever Study on GMO and Pesticide Safety

Factor GMO Press Release: 11th November 2014 (London) 

The $ 25 million ‘Factor GMO’ study will investigate the health effects of a genetically modified (GMO) crop that has been in our food and animal feed supplies for many years. It will answer the question: Is this GMO food and associated pesticide (Glyphosate / Roundup) safe for human health?

Farmers, retailers, governments, scientists and consumers have been involved in a heated international debate since GM foods were introduced in 1994. However, there has never been a scientific study that is comprehensive enough to give them a clear answer regarding the safety for human health of any one GM food – until now.

Factor GMO will also add invaluable data of unprecedented power to enable regulators, governments and the general public of every country to answer the question: Is the GM food and associated pesticide tested safe at real-world levels of consumption and exposure?

Study summary

Factor GMO’s preparatory phase started in early 2014. The full experiment will begin in 2015 and will last 2-3 years, with interim results being published at regular intervals during that time.

The study will test a herbicide-tolerant GM maize and realistic levels of the glyphosate herbicide it is engineered to be grown with.

The study will take place at undisclosed locations in Western Europe and Russia. The exact locations of the study must be kept confidential for security reasons as Factor GMO wants to avoid any outside interference that could compromise the day-to-day running of the experiments and/or the final results.

Laboratory animals (rats) will be fed the GM food and pesticides according to a protocol whose scale, rigour and range of measurements will meet and exceed current international standards for testing the toxicity of GM foods, pesticides, and other chemicals.

The experiment uses more rigorous approaches to investigate the fundamental question of the safety of GM foods and pesticides than are currently required by regulators. It will provide sufficient data to say with confidence whether the real world levels of consumption of the GM food and its associated pesticide are safe.

The three arms (toxicity, carcinogenicity and multi-generational arms) of the experiment will enable vital questions to be answered, such as:

Is the GM food (or its associated pesticide) toxic to organ systems over the long-term?

Does the GM food (or its associated pesticide) cause cancer?

Does the GM food (or its associated pesticide) reduce fertility or cause birth defects?

Is the mixture of chemicals present in Roundup herbicide more or less toxic than its active ingredient glyphosate?

The Scientists

The scientists involved in Factor GMO come from a ‘neutral’ background, in that they have no connection to the biotech industry or the anti-GMO movement, a factor that will add credibility to the results.

The 3 scientists on the study review board are internationally respected experts in their fields:

Dr. Oxana Sinitsyna; Deputy Director for Science at the Federal State Organization “A. N. Sysin Research Institute of Human Ecology and Environmental Health” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow.

“The scale and format of this research project will allow us to create a really objective and comprehensive data set on the mechanics of the impacts of a GMO diet the health of living organisms over the long term. From a scientific point of view the ‘Factor GMO’ project is highly ambitious, which makes it very interesting, for both the public and for the scientists involved.

“The evaluation of allergenic and immunotoxic effects are accompanied by the possibility of evaluating general toxicity and carcinogenic long-term effects (not just 90 days, but long-term over 2-3 years) of the use of appropriate GMO diets. In addition, there has never been comprehensive research investigating the effects of a GM food on reproductive function. The protocol of the ‘Factor GMO’ project includes the assessment of the impacts of a GM food on 5 generations, not only 2, as is suggested in the OECD* recommendations. Due to the uniqueness of the project, it’s a special honour and responsibility for me to represent Russia on the Factor GMO review board. With my international colleagues, we will make every effort to ensure a comprehensive research experiment with an impeccable reputation.”

* The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, which sets protocols for industry safety studies on chemicals.

Dr. Bruce Blumberg; Professor, Developmental & Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, USA.

“The Factor GMO study has the potential to provide invaluable information on the health effects of a commercialized, herbicide-resistant GM food and its associated herbicide. The cultivation of herbicide resistant crops is widespread in the US, and the use of the herbicides to which these crops are resistant has increased many-fold in the decades since they were introduced. There is a notable lack of published, peer-reviewed data on their safety, as well as data on the safety of the increased use of herbicides with which they are grown. The Factor GMO study could be very useful in reducing the uncertainty about the safety of these products.”

Dr. Fiorella Belpoggi (on the Review Board as a Fellow of the Collegium Ramazzini); Director and Chief of Pathology of the Cesare Maltoni Cancer Research Centre of the Ramazzini Institute, Bentivoglio, Italy.

“The concern over genetically modified (GM) crops is largely due to the fact that plant breeders can construct synthetic DNA sequences and insert these into crop genomes, effectively adding new traits to the plant. This raises enormous possibilities for developing benign products, but equally it has the potential to create products with unwanted traits and side-effects. The animal feeding studies performed up to now to study GM-related risks for consumers vary in test diet, length, and type of animal used, making the results difficult to compare and interpret. Most are too short to detect potential long-term effects. The proposed integrated rat-feeding study will investigate a wide range of possible health effects in consistent experimental conditions. The long-term study design will reveal any effects that take time to show up. The Factor GMO study could provide the detailed data needed for a scientific evidenced-based risk assessment of possible human health hazards from the GM crop and its associated pesticide.”


The funding process will be totally transparent and a full list of funders will be provided at the start of the experimental phase in 2015. We will not wait for the results to be published before publishing the full list of funders as many scientific studies do.

Up to this stage private individuals from across Russia and the EU have put forward the full funds (to be disclosed next year). We cannot disclose the exact amount of funds collected until now due to contractual agreements with the funders, however we can say that a high % of the total needed has been secured, allowing us to start the experimental phase in Spring 2015.

The close to $25 million in funding needed for this project has been/is being sourced from around the world.

Factor GMO has not and will not accept funds from the industry that manufactures GM crops and their associated pesticides.

The funders will have no influence on the design, results, or publication of the study.

The Organizers

The Russian National Association for Genetic Safety (NAGS) is the initiator and coordinator of the Factor GMO experiment. However, NAGS has had and will have no involvement in designing the study, in the day-to-day running of the experiment, or in the gathering, interpretation, or publication of the scientific results. These aspects have been and will continue to be decided and controlled by the independent and neutral scientific review board.

The neutral scientific review board showed interest in the comprehensive study, after the idea for such a study was published online by NAGS. Following a full introduction by the members of the scientific review board regarding their work experience and expertise, NAGS supported the idea of them taking full control of the Factor GMO scientific process.

The evaluation of correct protocols and the selection of scientists to work directly on the experimental phase of the study is under the complete control of the neutral scientific review board. NAGS has not had any involvement in this process.

NAGS was formed in 2004 as a non-governmental, non-profit organization based in Moscow, Russia. NAGS’s aim is “to contribute the protection of biological and genetic safety of humankind and the environment, and to promote sustainable development.”

NAGS has always promoted the idea of comprehensive safety studies on GMOs and their associated pesticides and has therefore taken on the role of coordinating the funding and security for the Factor GMO study.

Elena Sharoykina, initiator of the project ‘Factor GMO’, director and co-founder of NAGS:

“Comprehensive scientific safety studies on GMOs and their related pesticides are long overdue. All previous studies caused controversy for various reasons: choice of animal, insufficient statistics, duration of tests, research parameters, and researchers’ connections to the anti-GMO movement or the biotech industry. ‘Factor GMO’ is intended to remedy the situation. The project organizers have considered all of the points of disagreement and distrust surrounding this subject. Factor GMO has in its arsenal a scientific protocol drawn up with all the necessary standards, an international scientific team of leading professionals with a neutral background, independent funding, and perhaps most importantly, full transparency. Food is the main source of energy for all living beings, and its safety is the key to their health and well-being, as well as to sustainable development. In order to prevent irreversible consequences, humankind must ensure the total safety of GM crops and their associated pesticides before they are planted even more widely.



For details on the study please contact NAGS and vist the website www.factorgmo.com:

Nadya Novoselova (for Russian and English): oagb.ru@gmail.com Tel: +7 910 468-17-32

Ivan Lambert (for English first language): ivanlambert@oagb.ru

  • Finally!nI’m glad that this important research can be done in a good way. I hope that also long term effects of GMO food and of GMO crops associated pesticides on human health and on all live on earth in general will be identified and analysed very well.

  • Pingback: New $25 million study will look at GMOs’ impact on health | Truth About Trade & Technology()

  • youmustgo

    How will it be conducted? Because many people have stories about how they’ve been affected. Part of the problem is, all prior studies have been done on healthy individuals with no prior affectations. So many are affected secondary to other exposures. People dismiss individuals who suffer thanks to calling it anecdotal, and are summarily ignored. Lives are being gravely affected. And it seems as though no one cares. This is not just pesticides on/in food. This is also pesticides sprayed in buildings, yards, and on pets.

  • Susan

    Independent studies on pesticides have repeatedly shown that the full formulation rather than only the manufacturer’s labeled active ingredient is more toxic. The full formulation includes the other or so-called “inert” proprietary secret ingredients, as well as adjuvants, and surfactants rather than manufacturers labeled “active” ingredient. For example, Polyethoxylated tallow amine [POEA] is a surfactant that enhances the activity of herbicides such as
    glyphosate. The role of a surfactant in a herbicide product is to improve wetting of the surface of plants for maximum coverage and aid penetration through the plant surface. A review of the literature provided to the EPA in 1997 found POEA to be more toxic to fish than glyphosate.
    Active ingredients in one pesticide can be covered under a total percentage under in “inert” ingredients of other pesticides. An example, is the highly toxic diesel fuel has which has been considered a proprietary secret or “inert” ingredient in some previously registered pesticides and was NOT amongst the chemicals tested by independent researchers who only tested the labeled technical grade pesticide ingredient. The labeled ingredient, glyphosate was first registered as a metal degreaser by Stauffer Chemical before being rediscovered a Monsanto chemist for its ability to kill weeds.

    Furthermore, Glyphosate was registered based on acute studies done by the corporation. As of 1993, there were only two long term (chronic studies) done by 2 different laboratories. The USEPA, requested more chronic studies, but registered the herbicide, glyphosate, based on the acute studies–not the chronic studies. My source was the Federal Register, May 1993. However, this federal document has been altered and now recent dates only refer back to the original with the pertinent information having been deleted.
    If the studies find what other scientists and physicians around the world have found, I will feel better about the results. Not that I will willingly eat herbicide tainted foods. When I fractured my spine several years ago, everything grown with pesticides affected the central and peripheral nervous system in my body and the pain and inflammation was excruciating. A switch to a vegan diet consisting of crops grown by the organic method is the only way I can control pain without toxic side effects. I worry about the herbicides building up in groundwater, soils, surface waters and precipitation. We can drink carbon filtered water, but growing crops and animals with carbon filtration would be prohibitively expensive.i

  • Will Panos

    Lets get the party started!

Share This